A human readable version number or version label for convenient human rendition; not used by an application.
Wildcard: ANY attribute from ANY namespace OTHER than 'No Namespace'
Source
<xs:element name="terminologyAssociation"><xs:complexType><xs:annotation><xs:documentation xml:lang="en-US">terminologyAssociation links a concept to a code or a concept list to a value set</xs:documentation></xs:annotation><!--<xs:attribute name="id" use="optional" type="Oid">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation xml:lang="en-US">each assignment SHOULD have a project unique id so you can attach issues, manage the status machine, change with precision, and potentially delete</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:attribute>--><!-- concept id where this assocication is associated with --><xs:attribute name="conceptId" use="required" type="Oid"/><xs:attribute name="conceptFlexibility" use="optional" type="StaticFlexibility"><xs:annotation><xs:documentation xml:lang="en-US">Refers to the concept/@effectiveDate if conceptId points to a real concept and not to conceptList or a concept under a conceptList.</xs:documentation></xs:annotation></xs:attribute><!-- a coded concept --><xs:attribute name="code" use="optional" type="EnumerationString"/><xs:attribute name="codeSystem" use="optional" type="Oid"/><!-- human readable things for codes --><xs:attribute name="codeSystemName" use="optional" type="NonEmptyString"/><xs:attribute ref="displayName" use="optional"><xs:annotation><xs:documentation xml:lang="en-US">A displayname for the code, only for human readablility here</xs:documentation></xs:annotation></xs:attribute><!-- a value set and flexibility --><xs:attribute name="valueSet" type="BasicIdOrOid" use="optional"><xs:annotation><xs:documentation xml:lang="en-US">Reference to a valueSet/@id or @name. References to @name are discouraged because they become ambiguous quickly.</xs:documentation></xs:annotation></xs:attribute><xs:attribute name="flexibility" type="StaticOrDynamicFlexibility" use="optional"><xs:annotation><xs:documentation xml:lang="en-US">Reference to a valueSet/@effectiveDate. Default is unspecified which means 'latest available version'.</xs:documentation></xs:annotation></xs:attribute><!-- coding strength --><xs:attribute name="strength" type="CodingStrengthType" default="required" use="optional"/><!-- version handling --><xs:attributeGroup ref="VersionHandlingEffectiveDateOptional"/><!-- removed after talks with users: not relevant for now and a can of worms should want it --><!--<xs:attribute name="statusCode" type="ReleaseStatusCodeLifeCycle" use="optional">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation xml:lang="en-US">manages the status of the association itself</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:attribute>--><xs:attribute name="equivalence" type="EquivalencyType" use="optional"><xs:annotation><xs:documentation xml:lang="en-US">Rating of mapping between the concept to the associated code or a concept list to an associated value set</xs:documentation></xs:annotation></xs:attribute><!-- Only relevant after compilation --><xs:attributeGroup ref="TerminologyAssociationCompilationAttributes"/></xs:complexType></xs:element>
<xs:attribute name="conceptFlexibility" use="optional" type="StaticFlexibility"><xs:annotation><xs:documentation xml:lang="en-US">Refers to the concept/@effectiveDate if conceptId points to a real concept and not to conceptList or a concept under a conceptList.</xs:documentation></xs:annotation></xs:attribute>
<xs:attribute name="valueSet" type="BasicIdOrOid" use="optional"><xs:annotation><xs:documentation xml:lang="en-US">Reference to a valueSet/@id or @name. References to @name are discouraged because they become ambiguous quickly.</xs:documentation></xs:annotation></xs:attribute>
<xs:attribute name="flexibility" type="StaticOrDynamicFlexibility" use="optional"><xs:annotation><xs:documentation xml:lang="en-US">Reference to a valueSet/@effectiveDate. Default is unspecified which means 'latest available version'.</xs:documentation></xs:annotation></xs:attribute>
deprecated: use required. Required/CNE. Coded with no exceptions; this element SHALL be from the specified value set
deprecated: gebruik required. Verplicht/CNE. Gecodeerd, geen uitzonderingen; dit element MOET uit de gespecificeerde waardenlijst komen
deprecated: use required. Erforderlich/CNE. Codiert, keine Ausnahmen; das Element muss aus dem angegebene Value Set kommen.
enumeration
required
Required/CNE. Coded with no exceptions; this element SHALL be from the specified value set
Verplicht/CNE. Gecodeerd, geen uitzonderingen; dit element MOET uit de gespecificeerde waardenlijst komen
Erforderlich/CNE. Codiert, keine Ausnahmen; das Element muss aus dem angegebene Value Set kommen.
enumeration
CWE
deprecated, use extensible. Extensible/CWE. Coded with Exceptions; this element SHALL be from the specified value set if any of the codes within the value set can apply to the concept being communicated. If the value set does not cover the concept (based on human review), alternate codings (or, data type allowing, text) may be included instead.
deprecated, gebruik extensible. Uitbreidbaar/CWE. Gecodeerde uitzonderingen toegestaan; dit element MOET uit de gespecificeerde waardenlijst komen als een van de codes binnen de waardenlijst van toepassing is op het concept dat wordt gecommuniceerd. Als de waarde het concept niet dekt (op basis van menselijke beoordeling), kunnen in plaats daarvan alternatieve coderingen (of datatype waarmee wordt toegestaan, tekst) worden opgenomen.
deprecated, use extensible. Erweiterbar/CWE. Codiert, Ausnahmen zugelassen; Dieses Element sollte aus dem angegebenen Value Set kommen, wenn das Konzept kommuniziert wird. Wenn der Code das Konzept nicht abdeckt (basierend auf menschlicher Überprüfung), können alternative Kodierungen (oder falls der Datentyp es erlaubt, Text) eingeschlossen sein.
enumeration
extensible
Extensible/CWE. Coded with Exceptions; this element SHALL be from the specified value set if any of the codes within the value set can apply to the concept being communicated. If the value set does not cover the concept (based on human review), alternate codings (or, data type allowing, text) may be included instead.
Uitbreidbaar/CWE. Gecodeerde uitzonderingen toegestaan; dit element MOET uit de gespecificeerde waardenlijst komen als een van de codes binnen de value set van toepassing is op het concept dat wordt gecommuniceerd. Als de waarde het concept niet dekt (op basis van menselijke beoordeling), kunnen in plaats daarvan alternatieve coderingen (of datatype waarmee wordt toegestaan, tekst) worden opgenomen.
Erweiterbar/CWE. Codiert, Ausnahmen zugelassen; Dieses Element sollte aus dem angegebenen Value Set kommen, wenn das Konzept kommuniziert wird. Wenn der Code das Konzept nicht abdeckt (basierend auf menschlicher Überprüfung), können alternative Kodierungen (oder falls der Datentyp es erlaubt, Text) eingeschlossen sein.
enumeration
preferred
Preferred. Instances are encouraged to draw from the specified codes for interoperability purposes but are not required to do so to be considered conformant.
Voorkeur. Instantiaties worden aangemoedigd om voor interoperabiliteitsdoeleinden codes op basis van de gespecificeerde waardenlijst te gebruiken.
Bevorzugt. Instanzen werden aufgefordert, für Interoperabilitätszwecke die Codes aus dem Value Set zu nutzen.
enumeration
example
Example. Instances are not expected or even encouraged to draw from the specified value set. The value set merely provides examples of the types of concepts intended to be included.
Voorbeeld. Instantiaties worden niet verwacht of zelfs maar aangemoedigd om codes op basis van de gespecificeerde waardenlijst te gebruiken. De waardenlijst stelt een voorbeeld voor van het type concept dat gebruikt kan worden.
Beispiel. Es wird in Instanzen nicht erwartet, dass der Code aus dem Value Set genutzt wird. Das Value Set enthält Beispiele für den Typ Konzept, die verwendet werden können.
The concepts are related to each other, and have at least some overlap in meaning, but the exact relationship is not known
enumeration
equivalent
The definitions of the concepts mean the same thing (including when structural implications of meaning are considered) (i.e. extensionally identical).ISO 12300: 2 = Equivalence of meaning, but with synonymy. For example, ureteric calculus and ureteric stone; gall stones and cholelithiasis
enumeration
equal
The definitions of the concepts are exactly the same (i.e. only grammatical differences) and structural implications of meaning are identical or irrelevant (i.e. intentionally identical).ISO 12300: 1 = Equivalence of meaning; lexical, as well as conceptual. For example, asthma and asthma; ovarian cyst and cyst of ovary.
enumeration
wider
The source concept is broader in meaning than the target concept.ISO 12300: 3 = Source concept is broader and has a less specific meaning than the target concept/term. For example, obesity and morbid obesity; diabetes and diabetes mellitus type II.
enumeration
subsumes
The target concept subsumes the meaning of the source concept (e.g. the source is-a target)
enumeration
narrower
The source concept is narrower in meaning than the target concept. The sense in which the mapping is narrower SHALL be described in the comments in this case, and applications should be careful when attempting to use these mappings operationally.ISO 12300: 4 = Source concept is narrower and has a more specific meaning than the target concept/term. For example, feels ugly and self-image finding; acute renal failure syndrome secondary to dehydration and acute renal failure syndrome.
enumeration
specializes
The target concept specializes the meaning of the source concept (e.g. the target is-a source)
enumeration
inexact
The mappings overlap, but both source and target cover additional meaning, or the definitions are imprecise and it is uncertain whether they have the same boundaries to their meaning. The sense in which the mapping is different SHALL be described in the comments in this case, and applications should be careful when attempting to use these mappings operationally.
enumeration
unmatched
There is no match for this concept in the destination concept system.ISO 12300: 5 = No map is possible. No concept was found in the target with some degree of equivalence (as measured by any of the other four ratings).
enumeration
disjoint
This is an explicit assertion that there is no mapping between the source and target concept.
<xs:attribute name="equivalence" type="EquivalencyType" use="optional"><xs:annotation><xs:documentation xml:lang="en-US">Rating of mapping between the concept to the associated code or a concept list to an associated value set</xs:documentation></xs:annotation></xs:attribute>